In the context of a contract, the contractual conditions and the warranty right are relevant to determine the existence of non-conformity. [Gallagher v. WMK Inc., 2007 Ohio 6615, P15 (Ohio Ct. App., Summit County 2007)] Non-compliance issues, minor or major, must be resolved immediately if the activity is to continue. Note the new requirement to identify the nature of the non-conformities and the actions that follow. This requirement is comparable to section 8.3 – Control of non-compliant products and point 8.5.2 – Corrective measures. There is an additional requirement for organizations to determine whether other similar non-conformities exist or have the potential to exist. 70 Kendall v Lillico (1969) 2 AC 31 to 123 by Lord Wilberforce; Ijomo v Mid Motors Nigeria Ltd 2002 GWD 12-382 (Sherriff G Evans); Onutu vs. Adeleke and another  NLR 130. 2 This acronym is derived from the French Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa. The contract establishing OHADA (OHADA) was signed on October 17, 1993 in Port-Louis, Mauricie, and revised in Quebec City, Canada, on October 17, 2008. The revisions came into effect on March 21, 2010. As of September 2016, OHADA members are Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d`Ivoire, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal and Togo, and the Central African members are Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea and Gabon.
See: (last called september 13, 2016). 35 Cornu, G Vocabulaire Juridique (8th, 1987, Presses Universitaires de France) at 756Google Scholar; Santos and Toé OHADA Commercial Law, at the top of note 32 to 394. Auditors recognize non-compliance with the requirements to verify the power of companies and ensure that they comply with the necessary rules that exist in their field. Low non-compliance includes events or actions that are not mentioned in ISO 9001 requirements, but do not negatively impact the operation or quality control of the entire company. . . .